Publication Date: February 28, 1997
COLD Storage Remains a Hot Commodity
By Anita
J. Freed
Among document storage options, COLD remains a hot
technology.
COLD, or Computer Output to Laser Disk, is a means
of recording electronic documents as images for
storage and retrieval. Whereas imaging systems create
images of paper documents through scanning, COLD
systems capture data already on a computer and create
copies of computer-generated documents exactly as
they would appear in printed form.
It's not a new technology: Niche vendors
introduced COLD systems about a decade ago as a way
for companies to replace paper or microfiche for
document storage. Early adopters, naturally enough,
were institutions that produce reams of paperwork,
such as health care and financial services. But COLD
has garnered increased attention in the past few
years, as more companies recognize the potential for
savings and as larger vendorsIBM, Wang, Kodak
and FileNet among themsee the value of being in
the marketplace.
By the end of 1995, 15,000 COLD systems had been
installed worldwide, says Mason Grigsby, principal
with Output Strategies Consulting in San Francisco.
According to his calculations, the COLD market was
worth $325 million in 1995 and a projected $454
million in 1996, and is growing at an annual rate of
about 60 percent.
Fueling the interest, no doubt, is the potential
for significant returns on investment. "A
company can expect a hard-dollar payback of less than
12 months," Grigsby says.
As an example of a successful move to COLD,
Grigsby cites the investment service Charles Schwab,
which had been spending $40,000 a month on microfiche
to store about 15 million pages a month. By
installing its $1 million COLD system, the investment
service not only eliminated microfiche costs; it also
improved productivity and cut labor needs for some
customer service functions in half. Where it once
could take minutes to retrieve a document stored on
microfiche, it now takes an employee just seconds to
call up a document on his or her desktop PC.
Furthermore, a customer service worker can retrieve
the exact same document that was sent to a client,
making it easier to answer customer queries.
Employees can even send duplicate documents to
customers via fax from their desktops.
A COLD system can cost anywhere from about $50,000
to several million dollars, depending on size and
volume. A basic system will include software for
recording, indexing and retrieving documents; a
server; and a storage mechanism, such as CD-ROMs or
RAID (redundant arrays of inexpensive disks).
Grigsby says there are no real disadvantages to
COLD, though the major thing companies overlook is
volume, focusing on how fast documents can be stored
rather than how quickly they can be retrieved.
"The biggest error in COLD are users who have
purchased a system that under-serves users in terms
of document retrieval and indexing," he says.
An Expanding Market
To some in the industry, "COLD" is a
misnomer, as the market has grown beyond document
storage and retrieval. Today, COLD systems are moving
toward integration with document imaging systems and
are being used in conjunction with workflow, data
warehousing and data mining tools.
"COLD is old; it's getting older by the day.
More companies are saying that there is more that
they want to do with their systems that just retrieve
documents," says Alan Blume, president of
Filemark Corp., in Natick, Mass.
"In the old days, you would ask a COLD system
for a page and a page would appear. Today, you might
say: I would like to retrieve all of my telephone
bills for the last year for this account that have
calls to Hawaii on them. Then you could take that
information and export it into an Excel spreadsheet
and show it to a client who's questioning the number
of calls made to Hawaii," Blume says.
Blume, who uses the term "HOT," or
Hybrid Output Technology, to describe the newer
systems, is a strong supporter of cross-platform
functionality and systems that use industry standards
for databases, indexing and compression.
"Choices are important, but businesses shouldn't
be forced down a path they don't want. Nothing should
be proprietary," he says.
Market trends lend some support to Blume's
advocacy. Ron Bertrand, research director with the
Gartner Group in Stamford, Conn., sees vendors moving
away from proprietary systems toward cross-platform
support with Internet/intranet browser capabilities.
Browser-enabled systems are unlikely to be
"production ready" until 1998, he says,
but, "we believe that's going to become the
common paradigm. Vendors will have to offer that
capability. If not, they will die."
The Gartner Group also sees COLD converging with
report distribution systems and the Computer Output
to Microfiche/Replacement market into a broad
category it has named DARS, for Document Archival and
Retrieval Systems. Gartner pegs the value of the
North American DARS market at $600 million in 1996,
with compounded growth rates of 30 percent projected
through 2001.
"It used to be that these marketplaces were
separate. But it's clear from our conversations with
clients that the borders between these marketplaces
are being crossed," Bertrand says.
Not surprisingly, Bertrand also expects that
convergence will lead to a consolidation of vendors.
More than 300 fall into the DARS market now, but the
business analyst projects only 20 to 25 of these
existing vendors will survive consolidation. "As
the requirements for competing in the marketplace
become more complex, and the product requirements
become more complex, you will need the larger revenue
base to compete," he says.
Anita J.
Freed is an Internet project manager for
DCI.
Mason Grigsby and Alan Blume were featured
speakers at DCI's Doc World event. For the latest
programs on database, data warehousing and data
mining topics, please see the online brochures for DCI's Database &
Client/Server World and DCI's Data Warehouse
World.